KETIMPANGAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DI JAKARTA : GRADIEN SOSIAL DAN 'HUKUM INTERVENSI TERBALIK'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53067/bmj.v2i2.51Keywords:
Child protection, Poverty, Child protection systems, Social justice, Perlindungan anak, Kemiskinan, Keadilan social, Sistem perlindungan anak, KetidaksamaanAbstract
Contact with child protection systems are a key site of the expression of social inequalities, yet research into the
size and nature of this relationship remains sparse in Jakarta system context. This article reports on a study of the relationships between child protection system contact and small area-level deprivation. Using a national linked dataset including all children with system contact in 2013–14, (n =13,851 children) it found there is a marked relationship between deprivation and system contact, and significant differences between regions for all three outcomes of interest. Compared to children living in the least deprived quintile of small areas, children in the most deprived quintile had, on average, 13 times the rate of substantiation, 18 times the rate of a family group conference, and 6 times their chance of placement in foster care. There was limited evidence for the ‘inverse intervention law’ that proposes that children in similarly deprived small areas have higher rates of child protection system contact if they live in less deprived regions (larger areas). The pattern of placements showed the strongest support for this law, with children in similarly deprived small areas having, on average, almost twice the rate of placement if they lived in less deprived regions compared to more deprived regions. These findings have implications for policy, as they suggest a need to apply an inequalities perspective to child protection similarly to health inequities. Specifically, action is needed to address the causes of deprivation, provide services that respond to families living in poverty, address biases, and undertake further research to examine the interactions between demand and supply of services between similar deprivation levels.
References
Arruabarrena, I., & De Paúl, J. (2012). Meningkatkan akurasi dan konsistensi dalam penilaian anak Penilaian tingkat keparahan penganiayaan dalam layanan perlindungan anak di Spanyol: Serangkaian kriteria baru untuk membantu pekerja sosial dalam membuat keputusan pembuktian. Tinjauan Layanan Anak dan Pemuda, 34(4), 666–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.011.
Atkinson, J., Salmond, C., & Crampton, C. (2014). Indeks deprivasi NZDep2013. tersedia di situs web Universitas Otago, Wellington (http://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington ), dan di situs web Kementerian Kesehatan (http://www.health.govt.nz ).
Baumann, D., Fluke, J., Dalgleish, L., & Kern, H. (2013). Ekologi pengambilan keputusan. Dalam A. Shlonsky, & R. Benbenishty (Eds.). Dari bukti hingga hasil dalam kesejahteraan anak: Pembaca internasional (hlm. 24–38). New York: Oxford.
Bilson, A., Can’t, RL, Harries, M., & Thorpe, DH (2015). Sebuah studi longitudinal anak-anak dilaporkan ke departemen perlindungan anak di Australia Barat. British Journal of Social Work, 45(3), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct164.
Bilson, A., & Martin, KEC (2016). Rujukan dan perlindungan anak di Inggris: Satu dari lima anak dirujuk ke layanan anak dan satu dari sembilan belas anak diperiksa sebelum berusia lima tahun. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw054.
Bywaters, P. (2015). Ketimpangan dalam perlindungan anak: Menuju kebijakan, penelitian, dan agenda aksi baru. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ bjsw/bct079.
Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C., dan Webb, C.(2018). Ketimpangan dalam praktik perlindungan anak di Inggris pada masa penghematan: Sebuah tantangan universal? Pekerjaan Sosial Anak & Keluarga, 23(1), 1365–2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12383.
Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Sparks, T., Bos, E., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., & Scourfield, J. (2015a). Menjelajahi ketidakadilan dalam layanan kesejahteraan anak dan perlindungan anak: Menjelaskan 'hukum intervensi terbalik'. Tinjauan Layanan Anak dan Pemuda, 57, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.07.017.
Apriyanto, M., Azhar, A., Fikri, K. N. S., & Puspitasari, F. (2022). The Legality Of Cultivated Palm Oil, Research On The Readiness Of Small Holder Farmers In Indonesia To Produce Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) Is Reviewed. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 3(2), 76-81.
Apriyanto, M., Marlina, M., Mardesci, H., & Riono, Y. (2022). Turnitin Forest and Environmental Fires in Sustainable Palm Oil for Independent Smallholders. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research (IJOEAR).
Azhar, A., Fikri, K. N. S., & Apriyanto, M. (2023). Pelestarian Makam Syekh Abdurrahman Siddiq Melalui Pengenalan Hukum Tatanegara Dalam Festival Kampung. Journal of Community Dedication, 3(1), 78-87.
Apriyanto, M., & Novitasari, R. (2021). During fermentation, microbiology and biochemistry of the cocoa bean. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture,
Apriyanto, M. (2020). Evaluasi Sensori Produk Coklat Batangan Berbahan Baku Biji Kakao Kering Pada Berbagai Perlakuan Fermentasi. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian, 9(2), 53-59.
Apriyanto, M. (2022). Uji Kompetensi Agribisnis Tanaman Perkebunan. Jurnal Agro Dedikasi Masyarakat (JADM), 3(1), 29-34.
Apriyanto, M., Alfa, A., Surya, R. Z., Satriawan, K. N., & Azhar, A. (2023). Implementasi Kebijakan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat terhadap Peningkatan Ketahanan Pangan. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(2), 361-368.
Ramli, M., Apriyanto, M., Azhar, A., Puspitasari, F., & Fikri, K. N. S. (2023). Dampak Konsumen Terhadap Pinjaman Online (PINJOL). PaKMas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 52-58.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Supriadi, Saprizon, Aslina Putri, Frendli Wirnawan, Ahmad Afandi, Alpian, KMS. Novyar Satriawan Fikri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.