STRATEGI NOTARIS DALAM MENJAGA INDEPENDENSI DAN PROFESIONALISME DI TENGAH TEKANAN KLIEN

Syarif Facthul  Qorib; M.  Sudirman; Benny  Djaja

doi:10.53067/bmj.v2i3.55

Authors

Syarif Facthul Qorib Universitas Tarumanagara
M. Sudirman Universitas Tarumanagara
Benny Djaja Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53067/bmj.v2i3.55

Keywords:

Notary, Independence, Professionalism, Client Pressure, Professional Ethics, Notaris, Independensi, Profesionalisme, Tekanan Klien, Etika Profesi

Abstract

This study aims to explore the strategies employed by notaries to maintain independence and professionalism amid client pressure. Using a qualitative approach with a case study method, data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and documentation involving active notaries in major cities. The findings reveal that notaries apply various strategies, including assertively rejecting inappropriate client requests, referring to the Code of Ethics and Notary Law, consulting with professional peers, and managing pressure through professional communication. Assertive refusals are delivered politely with legal reasoning, while references to regulations strengthen their position. Peer consultation serves as a collective ethical mechanism, and communicative approaches help clients understand the legal limits of notarial roles. These strategies are adaptive, contextual, and demonstrate a synergy between legal norms, ethical awareness, and interpersonal skills. The study concludes that notaries can uphold professionalism and independence through a combination of legal, ethical, and communicative approaches. These findings are expected to contribute to notarial professional development and the enhancement of ethical standards in notarial practice.

References

Amelia, N., & Kurniawan, D. (2023). Pengaruh Pembinaan Etik Terhadap Ketegasan Notaris Menolak Tekanan Klien. Jurnal Etika dan Profesi Hukum, 5(3), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.25041/jeph.v5i3.2125

Ananda, R., & Prakoso, H. (2022). Tantangan Etika Profesi Notaris dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatan di Kota Metropolitan. Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Profesi, 7(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.25041/jhep.v7i1.1892

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dewi, N., & Rizal, M. (2023). Strategi Adaptif Profesi dalam Menjaga Etika di Lingkungan Kerja. Jurnal Dinamika Profesi, 7(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.25041/jdp.v7i1.2451

Gultom, A. (2021). Etika Profesi dan Tanggung Jawab Moral dalam Praktik Kenotariatan. Jurnal Etika dan Profesi Hukum, 4(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.25041/jeph.v4i2.1895

Haryanto, F., & Lestari, I. (2023). Independensi Profesional dalam Profesi Hukum: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktis. Jurnal Integritas Profesi Hukum, 6(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i1.2263

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Nasution, S., & Darmawan, R. (2021). Independensi Notaris dalam Perspektif Etika Profesi. Jurnal Hukum & Etika Kenotariatan, 6(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.31941/jhek.v6i2.1671

Nurul, D. A., & Kartiko, B. A. (2023). Strategi Penguatan Etika Profesi Notaris Melalui Pelatihan dan Pengawasan Terintegrasi. Jurnal Integritas Profesi Hukum, 5(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v5i2.2214

Nurul, I., & Kartiko, D. A. (2023). Peran Dukungan Sosial dalam Mempertahankan Etika Profesi Notaris. Jurnal Interaksi Sosial dan Profesi, 5(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.31098/jisp.v5i1.2564

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Prasetyo, D., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Adaptasi Etik Profesi dalam Tekanan Organisasi Modern. Jurnal Perilaku Organisasi, 5(3), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.31941/jpo.v5i3.1982

Riyanto, A., & Fadillah, M. (2022). Konflik Kepentingan dalam Praktik Kenotariatan: Studi Kasus di Kota Besar. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Masyarakat, 9(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.25041/jihm.v9i1.1932

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Saputra, A., & Aulia, M. (2022). Independensi Profesi dan Tantangannya dalam Era Komersialisasi. Jurnal Profesi dan Hukum, 8(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.31098/jph.v8i2.2017

Silverman, D. (2021). Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sugianto, R. (2023). Independensi Notaris dalam Perspektif UU Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no3.3912

Utami, R., & Hartono, B. (2024). Sistem Pelaporan Internal sebagai Strategi Pencegahan Pelanggaran Etika Notaris. Jurnal Integritas Profesi, 6(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.31098/jip.v6i1.2301

Yuliana, R., & Perdana, D. (2022). Peran Etika Profesi dalam Praktik Notaris. Jurnal Hukum dan Etika, 5(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.25041/jhe.v5i2.2133